top of page
Search

Sarga Bodywork, Myofascial Work, Stroke Direction, and Venous Return

Sarga Bodywork barefoot massage on lateral leg
Sarga Bodywork barefoot massage on lateral leg

One question that still comes up in manual therapy spaces is this:

“Is it wrong — or even dangerous — to work away from the heart?”


I understand why that question exists. Many of us were taught a simple rule early in massage training: always stroke toward the heart. The logic was that working in the opposite direction could impair circulation or damage venous return.


But the more I’ve continued learning, teaching, and thinking critically about bodywork, the more I’ve come to see that this issue is more nuanced than that blanket rule suggests.


The old rule is simple. Human physiology is not.


Venous return is not controlled by stroke direction alone. It is influenced by multiple factors, including pressure gradients, venous valves, breathing mechanics, and muscle-pump activity — especially the calf pump in the lower body. Research on lower-limb venous return shows that respiration and calf-muscle contraction are major drivers of venous flow. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15649978/


There is also published review literature describing lower-extremity venous hemodynamics as more complex than a single one-way model. In other words, lower-leg venous flow is not well explained by the idea that everything must always be manually pushed in only one direction to be safe or effective. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24436580/


That does not mean “direction never matters.” It means the old rule is probably too simplistic to describe what is actually happening in the body.


Different modalities have different goals


This matters because not all bodywork is trying to do the same thing.

If you are performing manual lymphatic drainage, directionality is part of the method. That work is intentionally organized around lymphatic anatomy and fluid movement, and research in that area has shown effects on venous blood flow as well. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23989970/


Myofascial work, however, is not the same intervention with the same goal.


In Sarga Bodywork and other fascially oriented approaches, I am not primarily thinking, “How do I manually push blood in the correct direction?” I am thinking about tissue relationship, tension patterns, nervous system tone, friction, drag, load, and how force is transmitted through a multidirectional fascial system.


Fascia is not arranged in a single straight line. It is layered, continuous, and multidirectional. So when I work with fascia, I am not assuming that every effective input must mirror a simplified circulation rule.


Sarga can be misunderstood as “deep”


This is one place where I think people can misunderstand foot-based work.

Because Sarga uses the feet, some people assume it must be heavy downward compression. Sometimes it can certainly feel intense. But sensation and compression are not always the same thing.


A lot of Sarga work is high-friction, low-lubricant, vector-based fascial work. That means the effect is not simply about pushing down hard. It is about creating shear, drag, and sustained contact through tissue in a very intentional way.


That distinction matters.


When someone says, “But you’re going away from the heart,” I do not hear that as a foolish question. I hear it as a question coming from a circulation-based framework being applied to a different kind of bodywork goal.


What the research seems to support — and what it does not


What I feel comfortable saying is this:


What I do not think is responsible to say is:

  • that all pressure in all directions is safe for all people,

  • that contraindications do not matter,

  • or that clinical reasoning should be replaced with social-media certainty.


Manual work still requires judgment. Tissue target matters. Dosage matters. Context matters. Client condition matters.

That is just as true in myofascial work as anywhere else.


My own conclusion


At this point, I no longer believe the old blanket rule — “all massage must always move toward the heart” — is a sufficient or evidence-based way to think about every modality.

I also do not think the answer is to become dismissive of circulation concerns altogether.


For me, the more mature position is this:


Different modalities have different intentions. Different tissues respond to different inputs. Different clients require different levels of caution.


So when I teach Sarga Bodywork, I do not frame it as “working the wrong way.” I frame it as fascia-focused work with specific goals, specific pacing, and specific application.


That distinction matters.


And honestly, I think it is okay for us as therapists to update old ideas without becoming arrogant about it.


We do not have to shame the questions. We do not have to cling to outdated absolutes. We can stay curious, clinically thoughtful, and open to nuance.


That is the kind of practitioner — and teacher — I want to keep becoming.


References:


Venous return physiology Miller et al., J Physiol (2005) — respiration and calf contraction strongly modulate venous return from the lower limb. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15649978/

Lower-limb venous hemodynamics are not strictly one-way in all local segments Recek, Int J Angiol (2013) — review describing calf pump activity, bidirectional streaming in the lower leg, and the complexity of venous flow patterns. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3699225/

Manual lymphatic drainage can increase venous blood flow Crisóstomo et al. (2014) — duplex ultrasound study reporting increased lower-extremity venous blood flow after MLD, independent of specific maneuver.  https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23989970/

Local friction massage increased popliteal venous flow velocity in healthy subjects Iwamoto et al. (2017). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5361022/

Direction-specific work is clearly relevant in lymphatic techniques Ramadan (2024) overview of MLD as a modality specifically intended to assist lymph vessel filling/emptying. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38300246/


 
 
 

Comments

bottom of page